home

An Assessment Methodology for Determining
Historical Changes in Mountain Streams


A recent publication by the Rocky Mountain Research Station, An Assessment Methodology for Determining Historical Changes in Mountain Streams by Mark Smelser and John Schmidt (General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-6) describes ways to analyze long-term stream channel change to better understand fluvial processes in mountainous regions. The methods rely on U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) stream gaging station records. The methods are designed to reconstruct stream channel histories that can be compared to histories of climate change, stream regulation, and land-use. These comparisons are useful for linking geomorphic adjustments to natural cycles, rare events, and land-use activities and thereby allow resource managers to better understand the susceptibility of mountain streams to flow regulation and land use.


Methodology Image

Data from the USGS stream gaging network is used because:


The use of gaging data has unavoidable limitations. Geographical coverage may not be as widespread as desirable because gaging sites are situated to provide the best combination of accessibility, measurement accuracy, and long-term channel stability.

Gaging stations are also frequently located along relatively stable reaches. Thus, when quantifying geomorphic change at a gage site, it is important to recognize that while these sites may be more stable than other parts of the same stream; they are not static or immune to change. For evaluating historical geomorphic change the most desirable gages are long-term stations whose point of measurement has not moved and whose bed and banks are adjustable.

Performing this analysis requires seven different files from each USGS gaging station. All except the recorder tapes are used to some degree in the historical analysis.
1. Miscellaneous working files
2. Discharge measurements
3. Level notes
4. Recorder tapes
5. Station analysis reports
6. USGS water-data reports
7. Statistical analyses of discharge data.

The publication describes the most efficient location and manner of obtaining this data which are widely disbursed throughout the organizational structure of the USGS. Since data collection at USGS gages began as early as 1895, most of the field notes have been archived. Smelser and Schmidt provide much useful information on data retrieval methods and suggestions for efficient tabulation and compilation to facilitate the analysis.

The first step in recognizing geomorphic change is to analyze the station’s stage-discharge relation (rating curve). The rating relation depicts the relation between measured discharge and water surface elevation measured at the stream gage. The premise of the analysis is that if the gage datum and streambed elevation remain constant over time, then either the gage datum or the streambed elevation has changed. For the analysis to be useful, all of the data have to be corrected to a common datum.

Figure 1 illustrates the history of gage datum changes at the Ashley Creek
gaging station between 1917 and 1996. The figure suggests that substantial adjustment has occurred over the period of record. The adjustment could be due to aggradation, degradation, or gage datum change. Station surveying notes are the primary mechanism for bringing all of the data to a common datum. Based on this information and other analysis, all gage heights are adjusted to the current gage datum. Once the data have been rectified to a common datum level, comparisons of changes in rating curves, streambed elevations, hydraulics geometry, and changes in channel width to a common standard are possible.


History of Gage Datum Changes

Figure 1. The history of gage datum changes at the USGS Ashley Creek gaging station relative to the contemporary 1996 gage datum.

Figure 2 illustrates the scatter of mean streambed elevation through time prior to correcting for datum changes. The data show 5 jumps (arrows) in the data distribution that are indicative of datum changes.

Plot of the Mean Bed Elevation

Figure 2. Plot of the mean bed elevation at the Ashley Creek gage without rectifying the gage heights. Figure 3. Plot of the mean streambed elevation of Ashley Creek for the period of record (1917-1996) using only measurements made within 50 feet of the gage.


Figure 3 shows a plot of streambed elevations at Ashley Creek through time corrected to a common datum. All of the measurements were made within 50 feet of the gage. The plot shows that the streambed aggraded during the early 1920s, was stable for approximately 38 years, and then degraded rapidly during the early 1960s. The smooth curve through the data delineates the temporal trend and represents the application of a Stineman smoothing function.


In additional analysis, the authors examine changes to channel geometry (width, depth, velocity), changes to channel cross-section form, and changes in channel width. A common objective is to piece together the various lines of evidence to establish a story of how and why the channel changed.

Once geomorphic change has been documented and the timing of adjustment established, the geomorphic and hydrologic histories are compared and contrasted by examining geomorphic change with respect to hydrographs for the period of record. One outcome of this comparison is to try to determine possible cause and effect hypotheses for channel change. Figure 4, which compares streambed elevation to annual peak discharge, illustrates one such analysis. The plot indicates that changes in the streambed may be related to changes in the hydrologic regime, but peak flood events are not directly responsible for streambed elevation changes.

Comparision of Minimum Stream Bed Elevations

Figure 4. Comparison of minimum streambed elevations of Ashley Creek for the period of record to annual peak discharges.

Smelser and Schmidt also advocate the use of detailed geomorphic mapping to assist with data interpretation and provide specific guidance for mapping. The cover of the publication shows an example of a detailed geomorphic map prepared for the study.

Mark G. Smelser has an M.S. in watershed science from Utah State University. Dr. John Schmidt is an associate professor in the Dept. of Geography and Earth Resources, Utah State University, Logan UT. You may order copies of this publication by sending your mailing information in label form through one of the following media.: Telephone (970) 498-1719, FAX (970) 498-1660, or E-mail rschneider/rmrs@fs.fed.us

Forward | Back | Top of Page | Index